>Steve,
>
>I agree. I think almost every programmer will find some use for the Project hooks. Even if you don't, you could still buy a commercial product that made use of the hooks. Randy Brown showed a hook he had written that would prompt you for whether you wanted to shut down processes in MTS when you re-built an in-proc server. If you said yes, it would shut down the processes, re-build the server, then start the processes again. Much easier than doing this manually. I can think of dozens of possibilities.
>
>My users haven't been asking for project hooks, but they have been asking for faster turn-around times on development projects. This should help at least a little bit.
>
>>Hey, what's this assumption that only commercial framework vendors are interested in PJXHooks?
>>
>>As for more flexible headers, I agree, of course <s>.

My system has about 10 different projects that produce different EXEs. I will se the project hooks and project controls to compile all my projects at once. This should save me big time.

Just a thought..