Greg,
Very interesting. I will look into this. Thank you very much for your reply.
Sincerely,
Einar
>I am not sure what the commands are in ASP.Net, but in ASP classic, I use these...
>
>In the ASP code, I place this at the top of the page.
>
><%
>Response.Expires = -1
>Response.Expiresabsolute = Now() - 1000
>Response.AddHeader "cache-control","private"
>Response.CacheControl = "no-cache"
>
>
>
>In the HTML Head block, I place this.
>
><head>
><meta HTTP-EQUIV="EXPIRES" Content="Fri, Jun 12 1981 08:20:00 GMT">
><meta HTTP-EQUIV="PRAGMA" Content="NO-CACHE">
><meta HTTP-EQUIV="CACHE-CONTROL" Content="NO-CACHE">
><meta HTTP-EQUIV="CACHE-CONTROL" Content="NO-STORE">
></head>
>
>
>All this maybe a bit of an overkill, but it works.
>
>Greg
>
>>One of my clients has run into some problems with my ASP.NET app.
>>Some background information:
>>- Clients PC is not connected to the internet (it is not connected to enything except a power supply)
>>- Client is running XP Pro and has IIS installed
>>- An ASP.NET application is installed in /inetpub/wwwwroot which reads and displays information from a table on the local computer.
>>- The ASP.NET app is a very simple app that cycles between displaying several regular HTML pages and some ASPX pages
>>- The app is not intended to be navigated like a webpage but displayed on a TV monitor only for viewing
>>
>>The problem encountered is that the dynamic pages (ASPX) are not updated. The information in the table is changed but displayed information remains unchanged.
>>
>>I had the client delete all temp internet files (cashe) and select the option to check for new content every visit of the page. This still did not help.
>>
>>After he deleted temp internet files and tried loading the app (localhost\theApp\index.aspx) he was presented with a messagebox:
>>
>>The Web page you requested is not available offline. To view this page, click Connect.
>>
>>
>>Why does this message come up if he is trying to run localhost?
>>Is the fact that he is not connected to the internet the problem?
>>Can anyone see anything wrong?
>>
>>Einar
Semper ubi sub ubi.
