>>Yes, we did and you still don't get it.
>Of course, the same one is worth for you.
That's true. I cannot understant why you don't get such simple concept: The repro code should be as simple as possible.
>For this bug, i retry to explain to you.
>
>Who guarantees that only assigning to the same value to PictureVal, the value it is release?
>This could happen also with one different picture reference.
>My code proof that this does not happen.
There's no need to demonstrate that something works. It doesn't add anything to the bug report but rather clutered it. If you think that it's important, put it as a code/comment after the bug report itself.
>Randy Brown has explained me much time ago (VFP9 Beta) the reason that provokes the bug.
And it's relevant to the bug report how?
--sb--