>>>Yes, we did and you still don't get it.
>
>
>>Of course, the same one is worth for you.
>
>That's true. I cannot understant why you don't get such simple concept: The repro code should be as simple as possible.
>

The bug is published on UT,
more is corrected to write a more complete code,
than show where the command works.
Sincerely, i'm sure to make a favor also the VFPT.

>>For this bug, i retry to explain to you.
>>
>>Who guarantees that only assigning to the same value to PictureVal, the value it is release?
>>This could happen also with one different picture reference.
>>My code proof that this does not happen.
>
>There's no need to demonstrate that something works. It doesn't add anything to the bug report but rather clutered it. If you think that it's important, put it as a code/comment after the bug report itself.
>
I don't agree with this.

>>Randy Brown has explained me much time ago (VFP9 Beta) the reason that provokes the bug.
>
>And it's relevant to the bug report how?

Randy known how.