>It seems that "argument" consists of selection of examples which may not be challenged and for which counter-examples are judged irrelevant. And there we apparently remain permanently fixed with the church as culprit. Seems like an anti-intellectual waste of time to me.
I see your point, but in general religion has been a regressive force in terms of science, education and civil progress.
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement