You can claim this as fact, I still think you are wrong. Why would someone choose to be a libertarian if they really want to be an anarchist? They see the need for ethics, rules, and morality.

>
>No, I am not confused. These beliefs have been advocated by party members. What you are missing is that the party eschews the very concept of philosophy, ethics, rules, and morality. Their very underpinnings are anarchism.
>


Yeah, I'm not going to do that. Maybe you could summarize the differences how Objectivism differs from Libertarian views.

>
>Read the works of Ayn Rand, Peter Schwartz, Leonard Peikoff, and Ludwig von Mises. The name of the philosophy is Objectivism.
>
>Kevin

Is this correct in you view?

"But Objectivism proposes that there is a rational morality, that it is not based on sacrifice but rather on vitality, and that this morality is based on volitional life as the prime value. This entails that volitional life should be protected. This protection of individuals by the state is called a right.

There is only one right from which all others are derived, and that is the right of self-ownership (protection of life) - the principle that each individual owns himself. This is the very definition of freedom. Laws against abortion, drug use and sexual freedom are predominently objections to this right."