Hi Bob,
I have heard the same things about SQL 7.0 and I have played with the beta under Win95. I, too, am waiting for the Embedded (Personal?) Version. And I would agree with you entirely, people should get used to VFP to SQL Server as being a primary topology. It's pretty simple with the SQL7 features you pointed out and it's scalable.
>
>Just for some added info (and whining) I am currently on a project using VB5, >ASP, RDO and SQL Server in a three tier environment. Do you know that if RDO >retrieves over 100 records (gosh, that's a lot!) it's rowcount property will >consistently store -1 meaning I don't know how many records I have! so we have >to skip through every retrieved record set to get a record count. VFP is such >a clean and consistent environment compared to VB5! Enjoy it!
I agree. In line-of-business applications, if you can get over VFP being a fat client, it beats the heck out of VB as a simple, RAD front-end.
------------------------------------------------
John Koziol, ex-MVP, ex-MS, ex-FoxTeam. Just call me "X"
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" - Hunter Thompson (Gonzo) RIP 2/19/05