>>>>Owwwww....watch out ... you might insult our 2.6 friends :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>*LOL* Just trying to keep us from going down in the same flames..
>>>>>
>>>>>>He's right. Nobody writes dBase anymore. Anyone with a brain uses VFP.
>>>
>>>
>>>With the new component gallery and Fox Foundation Classes, there shouldn't be any reason to not use VFP over FPW/FPD.
>>Craig,
>> I believe there were a few threads on VFP vs FP 2.x a while back.. And in them, some folks came up with some reasons why they still do development in FP 2.x, yes mainly in Dos..
>
>
>Then my question is "Why are you still in DOS?" With the cost of hardware today, I'm hardpressed to see a reason to still be there.

Craig,
The reason I am still stuck with FPD, is I have a 4.5 MB FPD application and I am sticking with it until I can port it to VFP.

I am finally getting a feel of how to do it, with the help of Microendeavors and others.

Alex