>>
>>Okay, I've reread it all. Still not sure what you're implying, but I think you think that religious people have an advantage when it comes to good parenting. If that's your opinion, then I say: NONSENSE.
>
>The advantage comes from a source besides the parents. "as for me and my house...."
Can you be more clear here?
>>
>>I feel not urged to tell you what good parenting is, but there are many books about it and in the scientifically based books religion is definitely not a necessary prerequisite.
>
>And in the "scientifically based books", I would bet you that a Mom and a Dad are not required either. If you are going to base your parenting on science then good luck.
You are once more talking real nonsense here. But I'll bite nevertheless ...
I suppose that you have kids AND a wife. If so, what will be the situation if you loose your wife, e.g. due to an accident or a disease? Will that be the beginning of bad parenting in your house?
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
