>>Hi, one thing I will love to see in Sedna is Try/Catch working on SPT functions instead of using Aerror(). It will be good if TRY/CATCH traps all kind of errors.
>
>This kind of feature would not fall into the catagory of features for Sedna, as it would impact the core VFP EXE/DLL files and we will not be enhancing core VFP features, and instead only doing add-on functionality written in VFP, C++ (DLLs/FLLs), .NET (COM interop), etc. See the latest VFP Roadmap for a high level description at http://msdn.com/vfoxpro/roadmap. More details on Sedna will be announced next month.

Excuse me Ken if what I'm about to discuss was already discussed or if this is somewhere in the past newsletters or in your blog.

It seems to me that not that long ago the Sedna project was'nt 100% defined. I mean that it was clear that interoperability would occupy a big part of that project but to me the official name was not chosen yet.

I mean VFP10 was a possibility.

From your last reply (to which I'm replying now) to me it looks like it's definitive and there won't be a VFP10.

Am I correct assuming that?