>>>Hi, one thing I will love to see in Sedna is Try/Catch working on SPT functions instead of using Aerror(). It will be good if TRY/CATCH traps all kind of errors.
>>
>>This kind of feature would not fall into the catagory of features for Sedna, as it would impact the core VFP EXE/DLL files and we will not be enhancing core VFP features, and instead only doing add-on functionality written in VFP, C++ (DLLs/FLLs), .NET (COM interop), etc. See the latest VFP Roadmap for a high level description at http://msdn.com/vfoxpro/roadmap. More details on Sedna will be announced next month.
>
>Excuse me Ken if what I'm about to discuss was already discussed or if this is somewhere in the past newsletters or in your blog.
>
>It seems to me that not that long ago the Sedna project was'nt 100% defined. I mean that it was clear that interoperability would occupy a big part of that project but to me the official name was not chosen yet.
>
>I mean VFP10 was a possibility.
>
>From your last reply (to which I'm replying now) to me it looks like it's definitive and there won't be a VFP10.
>
>Am I correct assuming that?

Message #1045923
VFP's requiem.