General information
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Fabio, yes I remeber now, I have read a longtime ago something about that.
>Gojko, now remember this issue ( a bug ). I post it some months ago.
>The first time, besides producing the error, VFP removes the definition of the cdx,
>in this way the second time cannot verify him the error.
In fact, missed CDX I can check like any other file with FILE(). I did that and if that is right I return file back from EXE with STRTOFILE ( FILETOSTR(...),...).(I include previously in projet copy of CDXs). It seems it works ( idea is not mine, read somewhere somebody did something like that ... ). Now, for errors like 114, corrupted CDX, how can I
recognize them in advance and do the same but with esacping messages Cancel - Ignore, which
confuses users ? ( I am considering to purchase SDT , but not at his moment ).
Many thanks, Gojko
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only