I think I was agreeing with you, but if you want to just argue semantics...

Call it what you will, but if I lose my job to someone in India, I really don't give a rat's ass what it's called.

>Moving some positions in subsidiary of some company is NOT OUTSOURCING.
>Don't mix the terms
>
>>That's it. There will be outsourcing, and from a fiscal perspective, it makes sense on some level, but when you start outsourcing positions of customer service and client contact, you are just asking for trouble. It may no longer be fiscally advantageous if you are losing customers over it.
>>
>>>The problem is not in Indians, the problem is in reqruiting company and company which move this activity in India.