The current Administration has already shown how it plays 'fast and loose' with interpretations (like of the Geneva Conventions) and directives (as when the Supreme Court said that GITMO folks were ENTITLED to some form of "due prcess".
It would be totally in their "character" to call something a "warrant" on some flimsy basis that was totally outside the spirit/intentions of a 'real' warrant.

To trust Government these days is perilous, and to trust the current U.S. government is downright stupid.



>The Supreme Court has upheld the need for warrants. It will be extremely difficult to get around that.
>
>>For the present.