Warrants are issued for specifics. For example, it a warrant is issued to search someone's home and the police search the car and find evidence, that evidence is not admissible as the warrant didn't cover the car.

>The current Administration has already shown how it plays 'fast and loose' with interpretations (like of the Geneva Conventions) and directives (as when the Supreme Court said that GITMO folks were ENTITLED to some form of "due prcess".
>It would be totally in their "character" to call something a "warrant" on some flimsy basis that was totally outside the spirit/intentions of a 'real' warrant.
>
>To trust Government these days is perilous, and to trust the current U.S. government is downright stupid.
>