>>This will certainly not happen with regard to my
published products, because I use efficient backup mechanisms, like most professional developers do.
>
>There has been many occasion where Refox has been asked to help under certain conditions. For example,recently a company decided to let go of their programmer, and gave him enough time to delete all source code of the application as retaliation. They own the code and yet have no way to access the code. Of course this applies to in-house applications, but the case is different for applications developped for outside companies.
Mike, I'm not denying that Refox is useful in certain circumstances. I'm only pleaing for a free utility that can be used to make an app insensitive to decompilation by Refox. Why on earth do you deny that this would be a sensible solution for the conflict? Is it because you make money not only thanks to companies who lost their code, but also thanks to companies who feel a need to add an extra layer of encryption to their apps?
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
