As stated before. Refox is primarily a decompiler (with the add feature of being able to brand and application which provides a certain protection against decompilation).
If a hacker has found a way to make Refox do something other than what it was meant to do originally I fail to see how this warrants writing another application and certainly not a free one at that!.
Perhaps Refox is not the product for you. Perhaps one of the other products that do application branding might be more suited for your circumstances.

>>>This will certainly not happen with regard to my published products, because I use efficient backup mechanisms, like most professional developers do.
>>
>>There has been many occasion where Refox has been asked to help under certain conditions. For example,recently a company decided to let go of their programmer, and gave him enough time to delete all source code of the application as retaliation. They own the code and yet have no way to access the code. Of course this applies to in-house applications, but the case is different for applications developped for outside companies.
>
>Mike, I'm not denying that Refox is useful in certain circumstances. I'm only pleaing for a free utility that can be used to make an app insensitive to decompilation by Refox. Why on earth do you deny that this would be a sensible solution for the conflict? Is it because you make money not only thanks to companies who lost their code, but also thanks to companies who feel a need to add an extra layer of encryption to their apps?