>What do you mean with 'granted a while ago'? Antirefox has, at this moment to us here, not yet been proven to work correctly.

That would be AntiRefox's probelm to fix. But at least with AntiRefox you are a lot closer to resolving your request than with Jan.

>You are denying that there is a responsibility issue. The maker(s) of Refox introduced a problem and the maker(s) of Refox should also give the solution to this problem, for free. It is logical thinking.

No, he did not introduced a problem. In 1992 Jan saw a demand for a product like Refox and he created refox to answer this demand.


>Each time you reply, you try to get away with it. Either you (deliberately?!) misinterpret my words or you simply ignore the issue and focus on something less relevant. It is a false tactic, in my perception. You'd be a far better representative if you said you would talk about the issue with Jan, understanding the point made.

I think your questionning the way I reply and not what I reply. I just don't agree with your request in this matter. You are suggesting that Jan writes an application that has been already written. (Refox XI does exactly what you want and I think you said you already own Refox XI so you already own the utility you are looking for).
I have brought your points to Jan, and his position is the same as mine. Although it is irrelevant if I did bring this topic to Jan, as you are discussing with me and not him. And I have suggested to you to send Jan an e-mail to voice your point of view.


>>>>>All I plea for is a free utility that can help us prevent decompilation with (a non-cracked) Refox itself. It would be the antidote to a problem that Jan has introduced and therefore is responsible for.
>>
>>Refox XI branding level II+ does that. It already exists and it is not free. And as for a free one anti-refox apprently does the same thing but its free!. So the choice is yours.
>>Your request for a "free utility to protect your application from being decompiled by Refox" has been granted a while ago.
>
>What do you mean with 'granted a while ago'? Antirefox has, at this moment to us here, not yet been proven to work correctly.
>
>You are denying that there is a responsibility issue. The maker(s) of Refox introduced a problem and the maker(s) of Refox should also give the solution to this problem, for free. It is logical thinking.
>
>Each time you reply, you try to get away with it. Either you (deliberately?!) misinterpret my words or you simply ignore the issue and focus on something less relevant. It is a false tactic, in my perception. You'd be a far better representative if you said you would talk about the issue with Jan, understanding the point made.