>>>>What you want me to prove, by the way, is impossible to prove based on basic logical facts.
>>>
>>>If you can't prove or support it, then I would stop stating it as fact and I'd recommend re-evaluating it as part of your belief system.
>>
>>Evan, if you want to reject what I say, that's your loss.
>>
>>But so far I've claimed that no other government has expressed the need for a democractic world, and despite having no knowledge that suggests otherwise, you refuse to believe what I have to say.
>
>I'd say you're wrong in this statement.
>All kinds of western governments have criticized the problems of human rights in countries run by dictators or under communism or fascism. This amounts to expressing a need for the democratization of those countries criticized.
>But only the U.S. has taken the step of trying to FORCE "democracy" into any place.

You could have just said "yeah".


>How do you feel about the U.S.'s and most other first-world countries kow-towing to COMUNIST China for the sake of the almighty buck?

US foreign policy is inconsistent.

We made a drastic change to it a few years ago.

The reason we didn't completely rewrite every international relationship we have as a result of the new direction for fpolicy is because that would disrupt world diplomacy and industry at an unprecendented level. Considering the US and China are the two largest nations in the world a complete 180 there would be a failure.

So things are done slowly, in a piece-meal fashion; as to deal with reality and work through the problems implementing these ideas in practice.

So in this early stages of the new direction, the fpolicy is inconsistent.

How do I feel about that? That's sort of what I'd expect for a work in progress.



>So on the one hand the U.S. forces "democracy" into places yet on the other hand they encourage communism and help it develop further!

You doubt there are plans on how to democractize China in Paul Wolfowitz's office? I gave you more credit.