>Well here lies the problem. I'm a very scientifical man. Religion has been invented by man (Have you seen monkeys doing prayers?) for very good purposes. It unites people and it is a powerfull tool to get people noses point in the same direction. Aside from the fact that there are a number of religions which differ significantly, the existance of a single god is highly doubtfull, moreover we don't have any real proof of it.
>
"Humans are the only animals that blush, or need to."
>
>I take an absolute unbiased position in this matter. I believe in science, because that can be proven. I don't believe in a god, until it has been proven there is one. OTOH, I'm not saying that I know for sure there is not one God. However I see no scientifical clues nor prove, to either confirm or dismiss the existance of a god.
>
Isn't the mere existence of all this a "clue?" I think it is. It is what stimulates the questions: why? how? when? etc. As a cop, when I see a body laying there with bullet holes in it, I naturally (foolish me) assume someone musta kilt them. When I see the stars in the sky, I naturally assume - someone musta put them there!
John Harvey
Shelbynet.com
"I'm addicted to placebos. I could quit, but it wouldn't matter." Stephen Wright