>>So I suggest we elect someone new. This would not in any way diminish Sergey's pre-eminence, which I don't think many of us would reasonably disagree with. But where can we do some good? Who is a serious, dedicated contributor here who is qualified for the award in every true sense and could use the credential besides? Let's make a difference.
>
>Sine last year, we started to announced three persons. This year, we will and related for three forums.
>
>As I also pointed out in another message, while some may focus on the stars, this is only one perception of electing someone. Additinally to that, there are also various other ways of contributing something good for our community.

I am not completely sure what you are saying. Some of it breaks up on its intended trajectory into English.

What are the rules of this award, in terms everyone can understand? What are the nomination rules? What are the election rules? I sure hope you aren't going to say you have chosen three finalists and we get to choose between them.