I was writing similarly (no Queen though < s >) when it occerred to me that "Review" is also used to relate one's "findings" regarding a play or a book or a product or (a) performance), etc. So I'd say the question is ill-defined at this time.

cheers


>Naomi
>
>Review means, as it sounds, "to look at again" and as such does not imply any changes. When the Queen watches her guardsmen trooping past that is "reviewing the troops" (she certainly doesn't jump up and start straightening their bearskins)
>
>So how about "Amend" or "Edit"?
>
>Or maybe "Revise" was the operative word thought of
>
>hth
>
>Terry
>
>>Hi everybody,
>>
>>I have a little problem making the following phrase:
>>
>>These are the subtleties of the English language that non-native English speaker can easily be fallen into trap.
>>
>>We're discussing the topic of "Review". Our QA person (who is from Ecuador) thought, that Review means no changes have to be made to the fields. Here is a response of my manager, on which I'd like to respond with the aforementioned phrase (once you helped me to make it proper):
>>
>>The caption Review, is what we currently have for the operations selections where we allow them to perform an action on the items. Review, I think, is more generic and does not indicate whether you will be able to edit or not, whereas View indicates viewing only, no editing.