>>No, that's not the ideas. And I thought it was quite clear... .NET should >>use DBCs and DBFs (through OLEDB) while VFP uses whatever pleases the >>coder.

>>Your "apples to apples" would be accommodated in that the data and >>results and development/testing time can be compared one-to-one to each >>other.

>>Looking to do "apples to apples" while tying one VFP arm behind its back >>ain't particularly straight, is it.

How about this... We agree on a schema and use whatever database or technology is suitable to the environment. i.e. the schema should work in Fox and SQL Server for instance. We are not comparing speed of database engines anyway just how we manipulate data in each environment once it has made it to the client.

Thanks
Rodman