Heard that an investigation has been opened today to find the leaker.

Is it just me, or does it seem to come a tad late?... the paper withheld the story for a YEAR on request of the Administration. Wouldn't the time for an investigation have been when the Administration was first contacted?



>In cases in which the administration undertook domestic surveillance without first obtaining a warrant, the administration "did not seek" a warrant from the FISA court within 72 hours, as the statute requires, or ever. U.S. citizens inside the continental U.S. (domestic) were indeed part of the wiretapping.
>
>
>>>I have yet to see real documentation or references that legalize what is currently being done in respect to wiretapping and retaining of the information gained from U.S. citizens after 72 hours outside of FISA or in contradiction to FISA law. I hope I do, because if not, then this is a gross abuse of authority. I am just waiting for the information from any source and hoping it will happen soon. Something could be implemented now which will cover this and that would be ok too if congress supports it. I think everyone agrees that it needs to be done but it must be made clearly legal and within his authority as President.
>>
>>http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/512zmkjb.asp?pg=1
>>
>>Did I miss something when I was on vacation last week? To my knowledge the alleged spying was not directed at US citizens. Bush has admitted he has directed the domestic wiretaps but I have yet to see anything that says he's violated FISA.