Okay... I'll go take my medicine now. I'm getting a touch crochety in my old age. I did read it that way, but re-reading it from your standpoint, I can see where you're coming from. I will go back to lurking. Sorry.



>Hi John,
>
>I'm saddened that you took it that way, and even more so if Dan LeClair took it that way. I only reproduced the sample that Rod had provided to lend some credibility to what I had to say about it. I didn't want it construed that I was someone who was more interested in complaining about the project than pitching in to help. I certainly didn't mean to imply that I was better suited for the job than anyone else or that I thought anyone was unworthy or unable to reproduce the application in VFP. There are hundreds of members here on the UT that are more than capable and that I learn things from every day.
>
>I am trying to help and my motives are pure. If others feel the same way that you do and/or it starts to look like I am doing more harm than good, I will certainly step aside. I'm sorry my posts gave you the impression they did, I guess I did a poor job of communicating my intentions.
>
>>Its funny how you jumped in and squeezed Dan LeClair completely out of the picture. He is supposedly already working on the VFP counterpart. I guess none of us are worthy.
>>
>>