>>Hi everybody,
>>
>>It looks like there is no way to derive a visual class from prg based class? E.g. I have BusinessProcess class, which is based on aCustom. aCustom is based on custom. I put aCustom and BusinessProcess classes definitions into separate prgs. And I want to be able to have my child classes NameSearch and QueueProcess in the vcx libraries. Am I out of luck and I still have to convert my visual libraries in prg every time I need to release them?
>>
>>Thanks in advance.
>
>
>Yes
>Except that for the XXXXXXClasses (deClass,memberClass... )
>the VFPT has not implemented the support of the prgs as source for the VCXs/SCXs
> in Class Designer/Form Designer.
>The change to be done to VFP is least, but by now the VFP run is finished
>
>Hacking VCX/SCX I have succeeded in making to work the all, but not in a way usable from the IDE.
>
>It moves within the aCustom and BusinessProcess to a VCX, if you are able.

I tried to hack vcx, but then I got an error saying that .prg must be a table. So, I guess I would have to convert every time. E.g. for my own simplicity of development I will use vcx form, but in our project we would have prg based classes.