>Who knows from spelling? I have two graduate degrees and still cannot spell kat.
>
>I like the flexibility of having activeX controls available and am very pleased that M$ introduced them in VFP5. But... (always a but)... there is a penalty in terms of complexity and potential compatibility problems to using them. So I use the _only_ if I cannot make VFP do the job. There are wonderful examples of how they can be used well -- for example the tree control on the UT. And there are some true activeXperts on this forum.

Oh, please don't say compatibility problems... Um, what kind?

I do like this calendar. I tried putting some of the other ones in that showed up under the active-x, to see what they did, but they all said I didn't have a license for them. Why include them if you can't use them?

Thanks,