>>PS -- That was a really cheap shot blaming 9/11 on Bill Clinton. I don't care how much you dislike the man, as many people do, it is bogus to blame it on him. It would be equally unfair to blame it on President Bush, so I am not playing partisan politics. Larger forces that were building for a long time led to 9/11. Even the President of the U.S. can only do so much. Especially when the "intelligence" agencies are out to lunch.
>>
>>You normally seem to have a keen sense of history. It wasn't evident in that comment.
>
>Mike,
>
>He might have been talking about the "wall" that Clinton's minion's at the state dept erected to keep the cia from telling the fbi about stuff. It seems fair to me that clinton get some of that blame.
Then Daniel should have said
that. I side with Mike on this one.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
