No, I don't think that was why it was rejected. The key thing was not accepting software contributions where there is an "existing 3rd party product". Then they seemed to backtrack and say it was because ActiveVFP would damage some existing companies if it were to become part of SednaX. Are you confused yet?
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement