>>Therefore the argument of "not just simply putting together all open source vfp projects" is very important.

>Can you please point out the post where ANYBODY said SednaX should have to do this!

I didn't put it in quotation marks to quote ANYBODY (or you), but to name the argument (with my own words) And that argument has been posted several times already. I quote with the mail/newsgroups typical prompt character ">" put before a line.

Okay, let's take your argument, that an integrated web enabling technology was requested and welcome as a good idea from several SednaX members. I don't doubt that, I have read most of the first project ideas and proposals.

There are two arguments that make that request a bit unneccessary: First there already are some web enabling technologies. Not only one but several. The disadvantage may be, taht these are not integral part of VFP. If you stress out the point of being integral part, then SednaX is also the wrong place to request that. This can only be done from Microsoft.

I think everything else already has been said and further discussion at least with you seems fruitless to me.

Bye, Olaf.