Olaf,

Okay, let's take your argument, that an integrated web enabling technology was requested and welcome as a good idea from several SednaX members. I don't doubt that, I have read most of the first project ideas and proposals.

Actually 3rd party tools were welcomed for inclusion and ActiveVFP was specifically mentioned in a SednaX release. Inclusion of 3rd party tools- even "lite" versions- was welcomed if they advantage VFP developers. It seems you didn't read that part.

There are two arguments that make that request a bit unneccessary: First there already are some web enabling technologies. Not only one but several.

On that basis there is no need for the open-source Asterisk PBX project. There are already heaps of commercial PBX offerings out there.

The disadvantage may be, taht these are not integral part of VFP. If you stress out the point of being integral part, then SednaX is also the wrong place to request that. This can only be done from Microsoft.

SednaX is a Community effort to create open source add-ons for VFP9. I don't think anybody is expecting its contents to be an integral part of VFP.

I think everything else already has been said and further discussion at least with you seems fruitless to me.

But you feel the need to have the last word with a passive-aggressive slap.