>Actually 3rd party tools were welcomed for inclusion and ActiveVFP
>was specifically mentioned in a SednaX release. Inclusion of 3rd
>party tools- even "lite" versions- was welcomed if they advantage
>VFP developers. It seems you didn't read that part.

Take a look at what Craig Boyd said in this thread:
Re: Interesting blog on SednaX Thread #1097725 Message #1098059

As he I surely understand that Claude Fox could be disappointed that Craig and others redecided against 3rd party tools.

And by saying that almost every argument has been made I was not making whatever kind of slap to you. I see you don't change your mind. I also didn't change my mind, and most others in this thread also did not. So further discussion is fruitless, as I see no compromise arising. That's all, no slap intended. Sometimes discussion lead to no improvement. Now if you want a last word, feel free. This was mine.

Bye, Olaf.