Hi John.

>Actually 3rd party tools were welcomed for inclusion and ActiveVFP was specifically mentioned in a SednaX release. Inclusion of 3rd party tools- even "lite" versions- was welcomed if they advantage VFP developers. It seems you didn't read that part.

You've mentioned this several times now. Let's make this 100% clear:

- In our enthusiasm for the launch of SednaX, we initially thought this was a good idea.

- After thinking about it a bit, we realized it didn't fit the vision of SednaX. Yes, we made a mistake.

- We've clarified that position now.

So please don't use this as an argument any more. We've moved on.

Doug