I'm sorry if the truth hurts you. Claude was in deed bullied with, and only a politician would be able to take all the BS he had thrown at him, without reacting. However, since Claude is no politician, he overreacted. If you don't see it like I do, I wonder what color your glasses are. <bg>

>This is nothing more than history viewed through rose-colored glasses and an attempt to revise that history. Claude was not bullied. Witness his latest posts on Sedna and you will see more of the same whining, bullying and immature behavior that led to his banning. Claude feels that the rules don't apply to him: witness the duplicate accounts, etc.
>Get the facts staight.
>
>
>
>>Michel and the other moderators argue that they don't have to give any reason for the banning, except to the person being banned. I was strongly against the banning, because as you write, he was clearly bullied with. I suspect that some of the "bullies" did receive warnings, because most, if not all, of the "bullies" have "transformed" into real gentlemen.
>>
>>>Out of curiosity ...
>>>
>>>I remember long heated thread where he was having duel with
>>>few members here and little bit later he was banned.
>>>
>>>It was never clear to me why was he realy banned.
>>>Was it only for that thread postings or there was for some other things ?
>>>
>>>Because I remember him being rude to some people here, but he was also subjected if not to clean insults, then at least to low level provocations.
>>>
>>>I must hv missed thread where someone actually explained why was he realy banned.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>I am seeing the name of Cloude fox in forum, he comes bcak?
>>>>
>>>>He seems to be, user ID 301. I wonder why some people were calling him "Joel" e.g. Interesting blog on SednaX Thread #1097725 Message #1098150
>>>>
>>>>I seem to recall a member named Joel Risby who does not seem to be on the UT member list any more.