>I've never said that the idea of a dynamic language in .Net is bad. It won't be VFP.

More accurately, I believe: you've been told it won't be VFP. I believe you have been told that. Unless I'm missing something, you aren't the decision-maker. Nor would I think that Milind is the decision-maker, who would probably be the same person/position who a few years ago made the decision to move away from dynamic languages, and would probably be the same person/position whose decision is now being contradicted on the ground, within Microsoft and without.