>I yam what I yam - a conservative. My point in all this has been to remove the illegality and it has been the Democratic party that has fought against doing anything every step of the way. As one of the leading Republican senators said to me the other day, "it' good vs evil isn't it?" Sometimes I feel like that is what's happening. How can anyone support a person for office when there has been such widespread corruption?
>
>I'm getting ready to go make a press conference with my friend who actually won the election. Our local county commission is about to appoint someone to fill the unexpired term of Senate district 29 and Terry has the votes if he wants it. He will refuse the appointment because of the questions involved in the process. The democrat we just unseated, took the seat at the first opportunity and the Democratically controlled election commission certified the election at the first opportunity. Then the democratic governor swore her in.

Just for the record, could you go through that again? I'm a little confused by the tenses. The commission is 'about to appoint' vs the unseated democrat 'took the seat at the first opportunity'. I assume maybe it's two different things, but I have to admit, I'm a bit lost.

>Don't tell me what to say or not say. Your opinion, twisted as it is, doesn't matter to me. I am doing what is right by any sane person's standard.

Alllriiight!!! John Harvey says I'm sane. I'm going to hold you to that in later debates. ;)

>With all your ranting and raving about doing the right thing, what have you done other than complain?