I would like to try this. Do you allow for specifying the rule for naming the class and the classlib file?

>I have developed an 'Alternative New Class Window'. It is meant for our community and will be made available as freeware. In this phase I need one or two persons who are prepared to proofread the article and test the application. Interested? From the article:
>
>When you type ‘CREATE CLASS ?’ in the Command Window, the native New Class dialog window will pop up and after having filled in only three fields a new class can be created. The required fields are
>1. the class name
>2. the class it must be based on; in other words the parent class
>3. the classlib that it must be stored in.
>
>That’s all and that’s simple. But I think it is a little bit too simple. Why? It is the class name that troubles me. All text books and all gurus tell us that we must pay special attention to the name of a class. It should be created according to a scheme, a philosophy. For example, the scheme may prescribe that any class’s name starts with certain characters and/or contains a reference to the type of class. ...Blablabla...
>
>Get the picture?