The classLIB's name has not been dealt with. The class's name, yes. I'll send a zipfile to you this (europe) evening. Hope you'll like it.
>I would like to try this. Do you allow for specifying the rule for naming the class and the classlib file?
>
>>I have developed an 'Alternative New Class Window'. It is meant for our community and will be made available as freeware. In this phase I need one or two persons who are prepared to proofread the article and test the application. Interested? From the article:
>>
>>
When you type ‘CREATE CLASS ?’ in the Command Window, the native New Class dialog window will pop up and after having filled in only three fields a new class can be created. The required fields are
>>1. the class name
>>2. the class it must be based on; in other words the parent class
>>3. the classlib that it must be stored in.
>>
>>That’s all and that’s simple. But I think it is a little bit too simple. Why? It is the class name that troubles me. All text books and all gurus tell us that we must pay special attention to the name of a class. It should be created according to a scheme, a philosophy. For example, the scheme may prescribe that any class’s name starts with certain characters and/or contains a reference to the type of class. ...Blablabla...>>
>>Get the picture?
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
