I just did some googling to find information about these documents. The only article that really discussed them in depth was from investors business daily. It discussed how the pentagon is supposidly sitting on all these documents.

It mentioned how these documents might expose links between Iraq and other countries that might be embarassing, as to the reason why these documents are not more freely discussed.

If there is such proof of a link so readily available, why has the administration gone to such elaborate lengths to fabricate evidence, to put credence in proven liars?



>>Unfortunately, we can not let it fall apart. And every link between Saddam and terrorist's has been debunked by experts.
>
>You obviously are not paying attention to the mountains of documents found in Iraq that say otherwise.
>
>>Why do you think ex-CIA agents are taking the effort to do things like confront Rumsfeld.
>
>One of the amazing things about our country is that anyone and everyone is both entitled to their own opinion, and allowed to voice it. Ray McGovern obviously has an axe to grind, but I question the judgement of anyone that thinks the West was behind the Al Askari Mosque bombing.
>
>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12643666/
>>
>>You are quickly becoming a small minority in your beliefs.
>
>896 Americans out of 230 million. Hardly representative, don't you think?