No way I would trust Win98 to be a server of any kind, especially with that small amount of RAM.


>Hi,
>
>A client is running a new application of mine. They are using a peer-to-peer network, with a dedicated Windows 98 system for the file server, with a whopping 96 MB of memory (yep, "My Computer" reports 96 MB)!
>
>Two or 3 users can run my app, but they are having a lot of trouble with the server and obviously need a new system (when a workstation hangs, the file server never detects that the workstation is gone).
>
>The office has 6 users, will never have any more than 6 users, and the (Gov.) office has a limited life span. They don't want to spend a lot of money on a new server and don't want anything complicated.
>
>Would a new, fast Windows XP system, set up as a peer-to-peer network be sufficient for them, or do they need something more?
>
>Thanks for any input.
>
>J