>>>>Why would I ask if you did something overnight? How could I possibly know that? Arrogant as ever.
>>>
>>>You gave me an order to execute some procedures in regards to this. So, you assumed we didn't do anything just because you saw the message online. Please, next time, before making such a statement, which could lead other members in confusing in regards to our the administrative procedures are handled, you may ask me in the message instead if we did something. Because, in that case, we did a lot of work in regards to that overnight with everything that is bound to such a situation. So, just because the message is there doesn't mean we didn't do anything.
>>
>>Which has absolutely nothing to do with how I could possibly know what you did overnight. I have no idea what things you are working on, or when. I will continue to ask you to address anything I feel needs addressing. You, as always, have the right to respond, or not.
>
>Whoa, CL! Aren't you being a trifle high-handed here? I first saw the spam message this am. BST (GMT+1) when most of your side of the pond is asleep (except for you). Next I see a DEMAND from you to Michel (not "ask to address") to do something. Michel has the right to be defensive when you come at him all-guns-blazing like that. What's the matter today - did you forget to take your happy pills last night, or have you OD'd on the snarling tablets?
>
>Chill
>
>Terry

Point taken. I did demand. I should have asked. The rest I'm still ok with.