>>
>And which church was it that heavily disagreed with the vaccine against the virus which causes cervical cancer, and under what pretext?>>
>>I don't know the exact answer but I'll take a guess.
>>It was a Christian Church and the reason was that if God had meant for people not to get cervical cancer He would not have created it.
>
>Seems to be close, at least in the identity part, though I think the reason was more in the "if they didn't fear cervical cancer they may come to think God created sexual organs for sex".Don't say that blasphemous word! They were created for procreation! Your heathen word implies enjoyment, God forbid.
You talk about "the virus which causes...". Does that mean that it was all in the master plan? I do not remember my Bible mentioning that Noah took one male virus and one female virus into the Ark. You must be confused.
If it is I that missed that passage, then how does a virus cause cervical cancer? Do you mean to imply it mutated? Cannot be. As you well know Creation is perfect and permanent. No change ever occurred. It was designed, no matter what those so-called evolution scientists would make you believe.