>>>See the other branch of this thread, where we were talking about Camp David 2K.
>>
>>Fine about the offer but what about the pullout? Israel pulled out of Lebanon in 2000 and the attacks continued. Why would it be any different in Gaza?
>
>And what was Israel doing in Lebanon in the first place? Lebanon is a democratic free country defending its borders.

You are ignoring the question. Israel pulls out of occupied territory and continues to get attacked. What did the pullout accomplish?

>As long as Israel defies the 60 UN resolutions (and Hezbollah defies that one) and doesn't return the occupied territories, the occupied people have the right to resist occupation and receive aid from whoever is willing to give it.

We're going in circles. You say Israel should pull out, then the occupied people will stop. I say Israel already pulled out of Lebanon but the attacks continued. I ask why will it be different in Gaza?

>Just like US is harboring Cuban expatriots who want to see Cuba returned to capitalism, or any other country aiding the liberation movements in Tibet.
>If after Israel gets back into 1967 borders the Palestine engages in military activity against them, then they will be the ones to blame. So far, they aren't a state yet.

Israel did begin a pullout of Gaza in 2005. I remember them uprooting the settlers by force. I also remember that Hammas started lobbing mortars from there newly acquired, closer position to Israel. Then there was that kidnapping, you know the one before the Hezbollah incursion took away all the attention.

If Israel goes back to the 1967 borders their enemy will simply consider it another victory on the way to the ultimate goal. The attacks will continue and be more deadly (because they are closer and bolder). "Palestine, from the river to the sea" is the goal.