>Actually the bible is a collection of stories on which can be interpretated in many ways. None of those intepretations is actually is more right than another. There is no one consistency. It should function to tell us morality and the history of it through time.
>
>Some take parts of the bible to 'prove' their intepretation of the bible is the right one. You CANNOT prove anything with what is written in the bible. It is not a science book. If you want to have prove for any wacko believe you have, there is no doubt you'll find a paragraph in the bible to support your view. However it does not make you right.
>
Walter,

Here is the bigest mistake.. Have you read bible before? I mean.. read completely as a book.. not as a set of rules or old histories..

Most of people doesn't read.. But, has a strong opinion againts bible.. Curious? not? Somebody read a single verse of this or of that.. And scream "hey this is not good"..

The bible CAN'T be interpretated in many ways.. this is a great mistake.. Proper of most of people that doesn't study it.. We're leaving in a time with a lot of non-informations.. hehe, I mean thousand of carbage on web.. thousand of people posing as *the informed* of many subjects..

Analysing any literary work or of art by the half.. Always you'll see a distorced frame..