>When a country with veto power vetoes a U.N. resolution it is NOT a resolution any longer.
>You seem to be suggesting that one can pick and choose the resolutions they like EVEN WHEN YOUR OWN COUNTRY DIDN'T VETO. Is that correct? And if so, does the same apply to business rules, to government, to religion, etc? And if so, where does "anarchy" come into the picture?... never?

Every country picks and chooses the U.N. resolutions they like and don't like. Are you under the impression that somehow the resolutions are law, and that you as a citizen of Canada (I assume) are subject to those laws over the laws of Canada?

If so, why would you allow a country, such as the U.S., to determine the laws of your country, especially when you know that the U.S. is looking out for its own interests?