>>Lebanon wasn't in a war, which was much better than in the 80s. Or now.
>
>That isn't peace.

Bad peace is still better than a good war.

>If that was the truth then they'd also care about the pieces in Jordan and Syria. Quite a considerable chunk of land. Why do you suppose we never hear a peep about them?

I suppose I answered that weeks or months ago. They aren't second class citizens in those countries. Nobody's flattening their homes, arresting them at random, forcing them through checkpoints etc.

>So even beginning the process is no good? How does one get started then?

By not occupying land?

>They really screwed this part up, that's for sure. I f they intended to keep it then they should've done more than just the settlements. If they intended to bargain it back, then they never shoud've let their people move in.

"Let in"? They were heavily funded and got a lot of aid from the government, with prefabricated homes and whatnot.

>Because they are on the wrong side. They are supporting the countless random targeting of civilians through terrorist means and Israel is responding. If the terrorists stop then Israel stops.

Not sure of that - there was a time last year, when over the course of several months only 5 Israelis got killed, while the number among Palestinians run in dozens. Don't remember the number, between 80 and 120. But - wasn't in the papers, didn't happen.

>2 state peace. If they keep attacking the cycle continues.

>>When an Israeli soldier dies, you get to know his name and that he was a gifted violinist; you never know the other side personally. (this is about "CNN as a weapon" two miles upstream this thread)
>
>Many suicide bombers have we had profiled on major networks. Especially when they are under 18 or female.

Thanks for proving my point. Suicide bombers are a showcase. Civilian casualties are not.

>>So you then agree Serbia should retake Kosovo? It wasn't really absent from there except the last seven years, and the history is more than a thousand years long, it should qualify.
>
>How about the Romans? :)

SSSSsshhhhhh! You want Romans to return to Iudea? You'll be accused of antisemitism within 5 messages, and we'll have another avalanche here.

>>Trying to destroy them will only create more. That never worked as long as they had a justifiable cause. Snatch the justification out of their hands first.
>
>They already did in Lebanon. Same result.

I answered this a couple of messages ago.