I got some work in the way this morning, hate that. But at least one of your points quickly caught my eye.

I give Conyers a lot of credit, a hugh amount, for stepping out on a limb. There are several instances of further investigations not occurring, or events getting completly whitewashed. He is a politician willing to standup and voice his concerns. There were rumblings during other occasions.

This is the whole point of how our govt is setup. There are supposed to be checks and balances in several stops along the way. Certain groups of people are doing their best to do away with these pesky little checks.

There are those who are ignoring the similarities to history, and those like Dragan who continually point how they've been there, they've seen this before.

>>And this is bad... how?
>
>What I was pointing out is that Conyers not only very liberal, but very vocal. You can spin that however you like.
>
>>>The report was released by the House Judiciary Committee Democratic Staff - not a joint committee, but a purely political one.
>>
>>AFAIK, last few times the Reps were invited to form a joint committee they refused. And even a joint committee would be a political one, you know. It's about politics.
>
>The House Judiciary Committee IS a joint committee. This "report" was published by only one part of it.
>
>>It's a simple step - from "we won't play" to "they're playing alone". Very simple. You only have to forget to ask yourself why did the GOP refuse to play. What did they have to hide?
>
>Or perhaps you should ask yourself why this appears to be a Democrat-only report. Or, more appropriately, a Conyers report (since he apparently is taking credit for it).
>
>>>At 350 pages, I probably won't read the entire missive. A quick glance, though, tells me it is simply rehashing a lot of left-wing anti-Bush propoganda.
>>
>>I know. You are a true believer. You don't even trust government sources if quoted by the other side.
>
>A little early in the day to be on the attack, don't you think? Despite the fact that I don't trust Conyers, in the interest of fairness I intend to read the report.