Mike Yearwood
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
>>The help says ALL means all records in the table. The FOR is limiting the records, so you're not doing all. ALL is therefore not required.
>
>O'key Mike,
>I agree with you that All clause is unnecessary,
>but so is clearly.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say. It is not clearer to use ALL when you are not doing all. They can be used together but they are mutually exclusive.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only