Hi!

I will be reading his book and will have a closer look at CLSA.net 2.0 as well.


Sarosh


>I currently don't have any .Net apps in production but if there were I'd say "yes I'm using CSLA.net 2.0" :) I loved it. Honestly still reading the book and trying to absorb. Once I do probably I'll be using 'flying BO' from then on:)
>Cetin
>
>>Hi!
>>
>>I am going to read that book and see what I can get out of it as far as architecture is concerned.
>>
>>Are you using Rocky's (csla.net v2.0) framework in your .NET Apps? If yes then how do you find it?
>>
>>Thanks for your help.
>>
>>Sarosh
>>
>>>I see. I also somewhat like that idea (logic in one place rather than scattered to BO/DB) and working on Rockford Lhotka's distributed architecture (csla.net). But still in that model storage doesn't call BO. It's a long topic (around 60 pages as I remember) just the layers architecture and what/where/why.
>>>If it really is needed as I said before SQLserver has capability to use dlls (and actually SQL2000 already used many external dlls for extended procedures, it just got easier with SQL2005, CLR is built-in). However you're asking this question from VFP perspective and with pure VFP, I don't know.
>>>Cetin
>>>
>>>>Hi!
>>>>
>>>>My understanding is the same (between the UI and DataAcces-DataStorage) the reason why SQL2005 would/could call it is that all that logic is in one place (in the BO)
>>>>
>>>>Sarosh
>>>>