You didn't say "non-binding". :-)

Seriously though, does it actually make a difference?

>Nope. That resolution was a nonbinding resolution which is basically nothing more than a recommendation. The UN would need to vote through a binding resolution for the U.S. to violate it by not adhering to it.
>
>
>>The blockade of Cuba.
>>
>>>Which UN resolutions has the U.S. repeatedly violated?
>>>
>>>>Repeated and continuous violations of U.N. resolutions, just like the US and Israel, I do not see you outraged by that